Bin Jajer
Greetings to Bin Jajer, and thanks for reading the blog.
I also believe that when a person goes out of their way to defend themself that it more than likely means they are a guilty party. However in the case of this blog, a majority of my readers are in the United States, and I am in Poland. Therefore, no one from that end has a chance to see how it really is- my Mother who reads from time to time for example- what is she to think? Unless she reads it from me that it isn't so, I have no other opportunity to clear my name with her and countless others. That is why I wrote in my own defense. Futhermore, I am really sensitive about this kissing issue. I used to be the kind of girl who swore she was saving her first kiss for the marriage alter- well, that didn't last long because Bryce was just too cute (and a really good kisser- whoa!) BUT since I am not a big fan of PDA (public display of affection) I got teased a lot in college because people never saw Bryce and I being "lovey-dovey". So I kind of have a complex about how people preceive me publically expressing myself in that venue- something you might only be able to understand if you are a Seventh-day Adventist who went to Blue Mountain Academy where even prolonged eye contact with the opposite gender could get you put "on social" (a punnishment where you were not allowed to have any contact with the person who you were "on social" with for 2 weeks- and this is a boarding school, so there was no way around it.)
Furthermore, in regards to my comment "if men don't get it (the secret messages) what good are they?" was part of the example. It does not reflect my personal feelings since, like I said, I am an independent, self actualized woman who speaks her mind in truth. I do not think men should have to play along with women's mind games. Futhermore, I don't think men are "good for nothing", and I am not a woman of the opinion that there are no good men in the world. I am not a man hater. Some of the most wonderful men on the planet are my friends, one of which is the very Mike Dunagin, with whom you side.
So you see Bin Jajer, while blog surfing you have simply misunderstood the situation. It is far more complicated that it seems and these few blogs only begin to touch on a delicate situation- a problem whose root has nothing to do even with me. Please visit again sometime.
posted by lady be good @ 10:39 PM
2 Comments:
All right. It is good to see a blog-writer, who relly reads the comments added to the notes. This one, though, has cast some light upon the previous additions. However, like the previous notes, this one still leaves a piece of mystery, a confusing query, left unexplained. I would like to make it clear, that i did not have the intention of siding with Mr. Dunagin.
As for the question you included in the e-mail, I had some problems with my blog, and are now moving to a different server. I'll write when I'm done moving. I'm going to look up your blog every few days.
Cheers.
BTW, Sorry for any misspellings or other mistakes. When I'm writing this it is 23.30, so it's pretty late.
Dear Dolly you are paying the price of associating with "younger" men who have not yet developed social cultural ethics. How "gosh" of them to carry on in public about their emotional needs and or disappointments. Nobody "learned" them any better. The art of disreetness in interpersonal relationships is the bain of the "yungins" brought up by soap operas or similar junk. the comments by BJJ were simply offensive, even tho he backpedalled later and claimed tiredness at near midnight. Thanks for Okecie. I a-Doll-you, Matan
Prześlij komentarz
<< Home